1. Rebecca's part of the story is told in prose while Amik's is told in poetic verse. Do you think this technique adds to or confuses the storyline?
2. Who was the real murderer?
3. What's the deal with the "Thunder Beings"? Was there a supernatural power at work here?
2 comments:
Anonymous
said...
1) I like that Rebecca's part of the story is told in prose while Amik's is told in poetic verse. It makes it more interesting to read because most of the books that I read are in one type of writing, prose. 2) The real murderer was Amik's friend, Ten Claws, or so Amik said. I believe him, and think he was charged with the wrong crime. 3)The "Thunder Beings" were a part of Amik's culture and he believed that they saved him. I don't think so, I think thet storm that occured was just a coinsidence. I do think that his lawyer had something to do with it.
2 comments:
1) I like that Rebecca's part of the story is told in prose while Amik's is told in poetic verse. It makes it more interesting to read because most of the books that I read are in one type of writing, prose.
2) The real murderer was Amik's friend, Ten Claws, or so Amik said. I believe him, and think he was charged with the wrong crime.
3)The "Thunder Beings" were a part of Amik's culture and he believed that they saved him. I don't think so, I think thet storm that occured was just a coinsidence. I do think that his lawyer had something to do with it.
Groovygirl,
I think you made some very astute observations about this book. Love your comment about the "Thunder beings."
Post a Comment